Happy to have it recorded. :)

Nice & rainy in Caloundra :)

The first definition applies ‘at the second decade of this new century’. Rigour says QIR is about to reach its use by date if that defn is followed. I doubt that Bernard thinks that. I do not.

We are justifying ourselves because reviewers are not aware of other ontologies/epistemologies and ask for expansion of methodology sections.

Many student HDR advice departments/units seem to promote the inclusion of these items. And students seem to believe the advisers over the supervisors.

Another metaphor that my colleagues with a Chemistry background find deeply problematic is ‘crystallisation’ which essentially refers to the process of distillation until the core concentrate is left. This is very different from the way qualitative researchers use it:)

Please post comments and we will do our best to answer/discuss in the chat or come back to Bernard towards the end of the session (just due to the time limitations)

Absolutely … re crystallisation - the qual positioning (dendritic etc) is so different to the distilling down in chemistry

…as a chemical engineer…crystals do not have infinite shapes and crystallisation is a purification process

Why not look at what the judge did?

Many of these issues just mentioned are when you commission the powerful and wealthy and sometimes corrupt that have vested interests in the status quo (usually where major social problems start eg wealth distribution, poverty etc) to solve major social problems. The philanthropy paradox

Good point Vince. This is where I find Bernard’s problematisation of postmodern nihilism useful.

What do you think about the some of the ethical codifications for exporting companies. It seems to me some of these principle are related to morality (e.g., no child Labour, working hours, etc.)

Are research paradigms incommensurable?

Walker and Evers in their Chapter on Issues in Educational Research provide an interesting discussion on three approaches to incommensurability between paradigms.

Thank you

One more question about ethical code of conduct as above. Thanks.

Please can you enable CC options

Thank you very much

1. Oktaviani reading 2. Robinson and 3. Fein & McKenna

I am still searching

i don't see a break out room option

Go with Robinson

That’s where reflexivity is critical in qual research

It also relates to the notion of transferability

Many thanks Bernard for your great overview and Harsh and Heather for organising. This was very beneficial session. Apologies, I have to go to another meeting. Thank you!

Thank you , Bernard!!!

Than you very much!

Thank you so much for this session!

Thank you Bernard, Harsh and Heather!